Whoa. New "Surface Book" just shown

Discussion in 'Microsoft Surface Book' started by scauffiel, Oct 6, 2015.

  1. Dim-Ize

    Dim-Ize Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2013
    Messages:
    214
    Likes Received:
    38
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Brentwood, TN
    I believe it is 3 hours battery life in tablet only mode. Sorry, not sure what other performance question you mean.
     
  2. Foreverseeking

    Foreverseeking Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2015
    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    8
    My Device:
    SPro3
    Couldn't agree more, and pray that is the future of this device. The more I learn about it, the less I like. I will likely get the surface pro 4, as I really adore the kickstand on the SP3. Also, I really want one USB in the tablet so I can use USB keys.
     
  3. Cyb3rDud3

    Cyb3rDud3 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2015
    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Location:
    UK
    My Device:
    SPro3
    Yes the more I think about it....I left my MacBook for a Surface for its form factor, the Book is turning it into a normal laptop again with its issues in the clamshell design in limited space area like the flipdown table on a train or plane.

    But wow, just seen the cost of the i7 16GB Surface Pro 4....That is just silly money...I think I'm going to pass on it for now.
     
  4. leeshor

    leeshor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2012
    Messages:
    5,070
    Likes Received:
    877
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Norcross, GA
    My Device:
    SPro4
    There was a video that commented on the fact that 3/4 of the battery in the Book was in the kbd and 1/4 in the tablet. Not sure if that means much yet.
     
  5. GreyFox7

    GreyFox7 Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2014
    Messages:
    6,899
    Likes Received:
    1,385
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Simple math on that... 12 hour battery life x .25 = 3 hours.
    Using advanced power management when detached you might stretch it a bit longer.
     
  6. hughlle

    hughlle Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2014
    Messages:
    3,115
    Likes Received:
    473
    Trophy Points:
    83
    My Device:
    SPro4
    That is assuming that everything is linear and simple.
     
  7. zhenya

    zhenya Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2013
    Messages:
    441
    Likes Received:
    66
    Trophy Points:
    28
    All of the processing power, short of the dedicated GPU if equipped, appears to be in the tablet half, so performance should be fine. During the reveal when they claimed that it's 'twice as fast' as a MacBook Pro I thought they might have a second CPU or something in the base, but that doesn't appear to be the case. Given that, I suspect that 'twice as fast' claim is quite a stretch. I suspect they are still using 15w dual-core u-series chips here, whereas the 13" MacBook Pro is using an older generation chip, but at 28w TDP.
     
  8. GreyFox7

    GreyFox7 Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2014
    Messages:
    6,899
    Likes Received:
    1,385
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Id speculate the 2x speed claim is based on a particular graphics benchmark using the GPU. That doesn't make it a lie but like any marketing statement, you have to keep a shaker of salt handy and use liberally.

    Performance faster than 80% of portable PCs sold. OK... Define portable PCs sold as qualified for this iPad Pro claim :) I'm sure it's true IF you qualify the set of "portable PCs sold" they way Apple did for this statement. It wont be what most people think. :)

    "I suspect they are still using 15w dual-core u-series chips here" Absolutely.
     
  9. zhenya

    zhenya Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2013
    Messages:
    441
    Likes Received:
    66
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ars Technica has a video hands-on and they show the screen with the CPU info and it's a i5-6300u which is exactly as I thought - 15w dual-core.

    Certainly everyone makes outrageous claims, but this one was made as a direct comparison to a specific product and I just don't see it holding up in any sense of the word.
     
  10. MissionMan

    MissionMan Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2015
    Messages:
    54
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    8
    I saw an article this evening that said the benchmark came from a 2012 MacBook Pro. Not exactly an accurate benchmark. I hate marketing people. Why even bother putting that stuff out there. Let the product speak for itself. It's a good product, there is no need to add statements like that.
     
  11. CrippsCorner

    CrippsCorner Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2013
    Messages:
    2,192
    Likes Received:
    246
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Essex, UK
    My Device:
    SPro
    Twice as fast is of course just great marketing... something else they're trying to catch up to Apple with! Luckily they did it with the event, wow, really awesome.
     
  12. zhenya

    zhenya Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2013
    Messages:
    441
    Likes Received:
    66
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Through the rest of the reveal I was really appreciating how straightforward they were being with everyone, so it was just a bit off-putting to put that concrete, totally not accurate claim out there.
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page
microsoft surface book benchmarks
,

surface book 1tb

,
surfacebook screen no kickstand