and I couldn't care about your point and your point doesn't make it valid! I've seen with my own eyes what happens when people don't use screen protectors... you think screen protectors ruin the experience? then that's your opinion and doesn't mean anything to me... maybe try using a glass screen protector? might get a better experience... you wanna take a chance and ruining your device that's your prerogative, ME im not gonna leave it to chance for $2 bucks.. maybe your too cheap to pay for a screen protector? but not me.
First you talk glass now you're talking $2..
I am not telling people that screen protectors are of no use. Everyone uses a device differently, its up to them and ultimately only they will know. The emphasis on my point was simply that a scratch on a screen protector does not necessarily equate to a scratch on a screen. That was the way you made your point, and I added a 'but'.
Personally though, given you ask, I use no screen protector on any device other than common sense. My phone goes in its own pocket, tablets have a neoprene/leather sleeve or type cover. But I went the extra mile and bought extended warranty. I can justify the price for that, but £40 or whatever it is for a tempered glass screen protector is just mad to me. I just remind myself how much I paid for the device and treat it accordingly.
You like them, I don't. Nothing to get mad about. Income is definitely something to consider in this debate. I'm just a chef/university student paying for a flat in London, the kinds of screen protectors worth owning are not entirely viable for me. I just take extra care and its worked out fine.