Exactly!
The purpose of a docking station is to provide significant expansion to the device that you wouldn't normally have when not docked. As such, here is my take on the docking station, based on what I've seen and read:
So, based on the above, there certainly isn't much of an incentive for me to get the docking station, based on my setup and use case. Hopefully they make a second-generation docking station that addresses what are, to me, shortfalls.
- USB 3.0 Ports -- From all the pics I've seen, the on-device USB 3.0 port is not accessible, so the net result is the same: Just one USB 3.0 port.
- USB 2.0 Ports -- For the docking station, this is an upgrade, as there are none on the SP device.
- Audio -- To reduce the number of devices I have to plug in, I stream my audio from my SP to the external speakers via USB. It's great to have this natively on the docking station, but it definitely is not a game-changer, either.
- Ethernet Port -- I currently have Gigabit Ethernet via USB, so it makes no sense to downgrade to 10/100 on the docking station's Ethernet port.
- DisplayPort -- With the SP2's DP 1.2 support, I am able to daisy-chain my external monitors, so no gain for me here.
I was shocked when I saw the specs for the official docking station, then I was doubly shocked when I saw the price, but hey, its Microsoft, what do you expect?
10/100 Ethernet? What is this, 2005?!?!
The guy on Betanews claims they may have issues with video and throughput speeds, so they wanted to be safe.
Can anyone explain why you wouldn't pick up this instead? Plugable UD-3900 USB 3.0 Universal Docking Station with Dual Video Outputs for Windows 8, 7, XP (HDMI and DVI/ VGA to 2048×1152, Gigabit Ethernet, Audio, 2 USB 3.0 Ports, 4 USB 2.0 Ports, 4A AC Power Adapter) | Plugable
The only benefit I see on the MS side is that you don't need power? But it is a docking station, so that doesn't mean much.
The first time I had such a docking station was with an IBM (not Lenovo) ThinkPad. I must admit that especially at the time, it did come in handy to have that additional HDD when I was docked. I used it to hold certain historical backups.Yeah I agree it's just not different enough to what's built in on the Surface anyway. I'm still hoping (although I know there's no chance!) for a docking station with a built in HDD...
I was shocked when I saw the specs for the official docking station, then I was doubly shocked when I saw the price, but hey, its Microsoft, what do you expect?
10/100 Ethernet? What is this, 2005?!?!
The guy on Betanews claims they may have issues with video and throughput speeds, so they wanted to be safe.
Can anyone explain why you wouldn't pick up this instead? Plugable UD-3900 USB 3.0 Universal Docking Station with Dual Video Outputs for Windows 8, 7, XP (HDMI and DVI/ VGA to 2048×1152, Gigabit Ethernet, Audio, 2 USB 3.0 Ports, 4 USB 2.0 Ports, 4A AC Power Adapter) | Plugable
The only benefit I see on the MS side is that you don't need power? But it is a docking station, so that doesn't mean much.
Hey Zimmy, thanks for posting this up.
I was just wondering if you knew, off hand, whether the HDMI port supports audio? I'm thinking of using one of these in my living room, hooked up to a TV?
Cheers!
M.
I was ready to take my Dock back but I decided to run the question of why MS decided to go with a 10/100 nic. My friend is a super smart IT guy. He asked to look at the Pro2 asked how the dock attached. After inspecting all the ports on the Pro, he said that it was probably because their were no real Ethernet connection the Pro itself. So the dock needs to pass the connection to the Pro and it was probably done via the magnetic strip on the Pro. He thought that this strip would not sustain a GigE connection and that's why MS went with a 10/100 port. I asked him if it would be possible to include GigE in future docks and he didn't think so with the current SP onboard ports. He thought they may be able to using the USB3 port but that might consume to much bandwidth is shared with other devices.
He also speculated that MS would count on folks using their wireless connection versus the Ethernet port as sometimes the wireless connection would be fast enough. I doubt this as I think moving large files would be best wired vs wireless.
I like the dock but don't want to keep it if there is no way to add a GigE port. If my friend is (semi?) right, then perhaps I should keep the port.
Any real smart folks out there that can comment on what my friend says?