So...I revisited Ed Bott's "60 days with the Surface RT" (you can read the original article here:
My 60 days with the Surface RT | ZDNet). I focused on the negative (in Bott's words "So what’s wrong/frustrating about the Surface?") points, which I am reproducing here:
•The selection of available apps is still weak. The number of apps is growing slowly, but it’s still a tiny fraction of what the Apple and Android ecosystems have to offer. And many of those apps, even some from Microsoft, have a “we’re still figuring out how to work with this user interface” feeling to them.
•This device, with its 16:9 display, works best in a horizontal orientation and is awkward (to put it mildly) in a vertical arrangement. There are benefits to this design, including the ability to snap one app (like a Twitter feed) into a pane on the side while you work with another app in the larger space alongside it. It also allows you to watch HD movies the way they were shot. But this design choice makes reading ebooks using Amazon’s Kindle app a two-handed operation. (To make things worse, the RT version of the Kindle app only shows a single page in landscape orientation, while the x86/x64 version can display two pages. Why?)
•Working in a world where Internet Explorer is your only browser can be frustrating or even infuriating. Some websites, for good reasons or bad, don’t work properly with Internet Explorer 10. For a ZDNet blogger like me, that’s a showstopper, because the ZDNet back end doesn’t allow uploading of images from Internet Explorer 10. The action simply fails. On a Windows 8 PC, I can just flip over to Chrome or Firefox. With Windows RT, the option to use an alternative browser simply doesn’t exist.
•The Office 2013 apps in Windows RT are almost but not quite the same as their x86 counterparts. For most tasks, that’s no big deal, but occasionally I run across a document spreadsheet that depends on Word or Excel macros. Oops! Macros aren’t supported on Windows RT.
•The lack of comprehensive driver support is an issue. A big theoretical advantage of Windows RT is that it allows connections to printers. Except there’s no RT driver for my printer, which means that advantage is still theoretical. Likewise, plugging in any USB device other than a flash drive is likely to be frustrating. I have yet to find a USB-to-Ethernet adapter that Windows RT supports, for example.
Summarized, these bullet points look like this:
- App selection/ Store
- Display orientation
- IE being the only browser
- Office 2013 RT not being the full version
- Lack of driver support
None of this is or should be new to those of us who have bought and use the RT. But equally, my personal opinion is that none of these negative points are really that substantive. Let me address them one at a time:
First, the App Store. In my original post I have addressed this. Briefly, yes, the App store is relatively sparsely populated. Most likely it will take time to build up. And, MS should subsidize developers (perhaps by providing a time-bound income stream) to develop robust apps for the most common apps.
Second, display orientation. I am still not sure what the problem here is aside from the fact that Apple has apparently patented what may be the most optimal size and dimension that befits a tablet. Again, I am not sure about this. The landscape mode does have its advantages and it ends up being a question of trade-offs, which we do all the time.
Third, IE being the only browser. Well, yes, I can see that - especially because before I started using the Surface and Win 8 on my desktop, I was (and to some extent remain) heavily invested in Google's services. But I can understand MS's logic for pursuing this course of action. Unlike Google (who probably cares less what browser we use as long as it is able to go about its data mining and ad-related activities) MS and to a certain extent Apple (principally with the iPad) want to be our window to the web. Seeing that we live in the browser, MS and Apple would like us to see the web through their eyes. And one consequence of this is that both companies are increasingly becoming exclusionary (though they can't afford to do this on their respective desktop OSs). In effect, therefore, MS is asking us to make a choice - like Apple has asked and the singular browser is a manifestation of that.
Fourth, Office 2013 RT is not the full version. Yeah right! I thank my stars that at least I have a version of Office that does not break documents that I create in the full version in the first place - and yes, I have tried - as most of you must also have - to use the various clones that the Android world offers. Not having tried the Apple versions, I would not know.
Fifth, and lastly, the driver issue. Yes, this may be a problem where peripherals are concerned. But thus far, I have not really run into a problem. But definitely, MS needs to up the ante here because this is, again in my opinion, one of the key USPs of the Surface RT.
Ok...so why did I post all this? Just wanted to get this off my chest. And, of course, to invite your opinions!
Cheers!