ChrisPanzer
Active Member
Ummmm, I have my BL key memorized actually.
I actually noticed a significant speed increase since disabling bit locker so I think I'll keep it off for now. Thanks much!
Improving SSD performance
- Thread starter ctitanic
- Start date
I actually noticed a significant speed increase since disabling bit locker so I think I'll keep it off for now. Thanks much!
So I do, but I doubt a thief can easily find it (still possible, though)
The tool to improve performance of the Samsung SSD essentially rewrites the data on the SSD. Decrypting the SSD will do exactly the same thing because every block of data has to be read, decrypted and rewritten. That's likely the only performance difference you see as the hardware encryption will keep pace with the drive speed.
I suppose the entire Whole Disk encryption industry should run for the hills since they do nothing useful in your mind. no wait, perhaps they encrypted your mind ... wow that was useful.
I suppose the entire Whole Disk encryption industry should run for the hills since they do nothing useful in your mind. no wait, perhaps they encrypted your mind ... wow that was useful.
That will explain the performance gain when decrypting the disk.The tool to improve performance of the Samsung SSD essentially rewrites the data on the SSD. Decrypting the SSD will do exactly the same thing because every block of data has to be read, decrypted and rewritten. That's likely the only performance difference you see as the hardware encryption will keep pace with the drive speed.
I suppose the entire Whole Disk encryption industry should run for the hills since they do nothing useful in your mind. no wait, perhaps they encrypted your mind ... wow that was useful.
But in theory, while the TPM can keep up with the SSD speed, it will add some latency. Of course the whole think cannot be noticed in any way in real life (I imagine it should be <1ms). It is just to be more annoying than I usually am.
The TPM in Ghostbuster terminology is the Key Master. The encryption decryption hardware is included on the disk. In the scenario where you don't have a SED (self encrypting disk) that job may fall to the CPU which you would notice.That will explain the performance gain when decrypting the disk.
But in theory, while the TPM can keep up with the SSD speed, it will add some latency. Of course the whole think cannot be noticed in any way in real life (I imagine it should be <1ms). It is just to be more annoying than I usually am.
Sorry.. I actually believed the TPM chip (or some other component on the motherboard) would process the encryption/decryption, but the only options are the one you mention (CPU or HDD).
So, IF any latency is added, it would be even smaller than what I imagined
P.S.: I believe this has gone on for too long. Maybe we should open a specific thread
The other option might be the Disk Controller which in a larger system might be a PCIe card but to my knowledge there aren't any chipsets with encrypting SATA controllers and there are lots of SEDs on the market but I cant think of any Disk Array Controllers that do encryption (there probably are some) but this too would be a bottle neck and likely why SEDs came into being as the better solution distributing the work as much as possible and as close to the data as possible. The Key however is the missing piece that makes scrambled eggs out of intelligible data/(whole golden eggs) or vice versa which is safely locked in the TPM.
http://www.cryptomathic.com/news-events/blog/the-trusted-platform-module-explained
http://www.cryptomathic.com/news-events/blog/the-trusted-platform-module-explained
Last edited:
fletch33
Member
so i got this update on the SP3 today. is this the "official" update being described here? the "more info" button leads to "info coming soon" page so no more details to be found. it also installed quick and although it mentioned a possible restart needed it didnt require it after install. here is a screen shot
fletch33
Member
here is what i have been able to find on this update name from previously named update and no info available on that update either:
From WD tech support site:
- The SES driver is not required for your drive to be recognized by your computer. If your drive is not recognized please see Answer ID 1708: I cannot find drivers for my WD drive and/or my Operating System fails to recognize my WD drive.
- The SES (SCSI Enclosure Services) driver is different from the Virtual CD, and WD SmartWare 1.6.X. To access many of the optional features of your drive, you will be required to install both the SES driver, and WD SmartWare. If you wish to use the drive as a simple hard drive and do not require access to the advanced features of the drive, you can hide the VCD by following Answer ID 3835: How to disable (hide) the Virtual CD (VCD) for Windows or Mac OSX on a My Book or My Passport drive . Western Digital still recommends installing the SES driver when not using WD SmartWare, but the drive will function without it. The prompts to install the driver are part of the Windows Operating system and will always occur when connecting a drive to a Windows PC without the driver installed.
I am still not sure of exactly what it does. Will be attentive to any negative effects if any. So far have not noticed any. Consensus is to keep it. We will see.
EDIT:
Checked for the WD folder in Program Files. NOT PRESENT
It seems that it did not install even after I manually restarted.
EDIT:
Checked for the WD folder in Program Files. NOT PRESENT
It seems that it did not install even after I manually restarted.
Last edited:
I believe you must have a Western Digital external disk (as I do). I don't think this update is related to the SSD within the SP3so i got this update on the SP3 today. is this the "official" update being described here? the "more info" button leads to "info coming soon" page so no more details to be found. it also installed quick and although it mentioned a possible restart needed it didnt require it after install. here is a screen shot
